Date: 10/31/2012 (updated 12/3/12) (updated 10/22/13)
Subject Name: Jordan McKee
DOB: 06/20/1978
DOD: 05/??/2011
Gender: Female
Age: 34
Place of Examination: Data compiled at Chandler/Hammett Investigations offices
Occupation: Waitress at The Gun & Rose; member of The Guard
Marital Status: Single, former relationship PT-TR-####, suspected past relationship WR-####
Race: Troubled
Classification: TR-BD-####
Presents with:
Subject is inclined to keep to herself; unknown at this time if this is
a result of her Trouble activating or an innate tendency. Given her
anger at her present state and her current occupation, it seems
likeliest that subject enjoyed spending time around people prior to the
Troubles and since that time considers it safest if she removes herself
from society. This has led to a tendency to lash out verbally, followed
by physical contact (gloved or ungloved depending on subject's sense of
personal safety) should the verbal warning be ignored. Subject despises
her Trouble and, quite probably, herself; this has created a feedback
loop unlike most rape victims' where she is reminded of her initial
assault every day. Worse, her affiliation with the Guard means that
sometimes she is expected to use her Trouble as a weapon, making her
mental state more fragile as such incidents add up. Wuornos is the first
person able to touch her (though we believe subject IN-#### would be
able to do so as well, we lack evidence), and as a result subject has a
strong attachment to him, verging on addiction. Updated 12/3/12: Subject
developed a fixation to the point of obsession with subject PT-TR-####,
including the belief that she knew what was best for their
relationship. This belief was founded solely on her experience as a
member of the Guard, not on discussion or trading information with
Wuornos. Subject believes that IN-#### is the source of the disruption
to and ending of their relationship, rather than any actions or
inactions she took. She deliberately manipulated and misled all parties
in an attempt to gain influence over subjects PT-TR-#### (direct) and
IN-#### (indirect), and continually protested that her actions were "for
[them]." This speaks to her unwillingness (and perhaps inability) to do
anything other than follow orders from the Guard. Updated 1/28/13: Subject
may be second-in-command of the day to day operations of the Guard, or
alternately may exist outside the hierarchy for reasons related to her
Trouble and her positioning relative to subject PT-TR-####. When she
appeared most recently, body language and assertive behavior indicated
that she considered herself relatively high-ranking within the group,
though this belief may have been wholly wrong due to her lack of
knowledge regarding the ultimate authority. Subject was disdainful and
upset by the indication that subject ST-BD-#### was in love with subject
IN-#### designation Audrey Parker, in keeping with prior reactions to
Parker as regarding relationships of any kind. This indicates a lack of
knowledge about how subject IN-#### functions, along with the barn; we
may extrapolate that subject believes that the two are linked only
insofar as the alleviation of the Troubles for another 27 years, that
subject IN-####'s purpose is to alleviate individual Troubles and
protect Haven with each resurgence and then leave when the barn comes.
Subject indeed proved unwilling to disobey orders from the Guard, though
the revelation that subject TD-BD-#### was in charge of the group led
her to finally choose her own target. This target was, as expected,
subject PT-TR-#### due to his attempts to destroy the barn (see case
file AG-####) once subject IN-#### entered it. Subject fired multiple
shots at Wuornos upon his firing shots at subject AG-####; this was then
followed by multiple shots fired at subject by Crocker, who was also
present at the time. Subject's physical whereabouts and status are
unknown at this time. It is notable that she fired on Wuornos after he
presented a clear and present threat to subject AG-#### but before he
fired; due to his Trouble he was unaffected by the pain as any other
person would have been. It is unclear whether subject did not realize
this, subject's aim was off, or subject was not shooting to kill in the
first place. Subsequent shots may not lower the percentage of the
latter's probability; rather, subject may have fired repeatedly in
response to emotional stimuli rather than calculated thought. It is now
clear that subject has several priorities: removal of her Trouble,
reacquisition of her relationship with Wuornos, and removal of Parker
from Haven, all of which are enmeshed in subject's attitude toward the
Troubles in general and subject IN-####, the barn, and the Guard in
specific.
Updated 10/22/13: Subject survived the incident at the artifact known as the Barn due to the efforts of subjects WR-#### and PT-TR-####, who were respectively competent in battlefield medicine and able to touch the subject. Following subject PT-TR-####'s departure from Haven due to his (not inaccurate) belief that he had caused a worse fate for all people in the town both Troubled and unTroubled, subject appears to have bolstered her position within the Guard. Concurrent with this appears to have been subject TD-BD-####'s loss of status within the organization, leading to an apparent schism within the group at subject's instigation. Subject entered a major yet functional depression, leading the Guard in daily operations and possibly working parallel to subject WR-#### in his new position as chief of police in order to assist civilians within the town. It is likely that had this continued unabated, subject would have died in the line of her duties with the Guard, as the Troubles appear to be increasing in lethality in recent months. However, with the reappearance of subjects ST-BD-#### and PT-TR-####, subject developed a new fixation (encouraged and abetted by said subjects) that despite her desire to kill subject PT-TR-#### for his part in allowing the Troubles to continue with no feasible end in sight, it was yet possible that subject IN-#### would reappear and that she would then carry out the supposed final solution to the Troubles, i.e., killing the man she loves. Though there is no evidence to suggest that subject IN-#### designation Audrey Parker (or, for that matter, any other designation) would be willing to commit such an act, all subjects involved in this plan have accepted it as their best case scenario. Subject's fixation with this scenario has been frequently indicated by her as a desire to end the Troubles so she can experience human contact again; citing every study that demonstrates the negative effects of denying a person physical contact for an extended period of time is beyond the scope of this profile but should be taken as read. As subject devolved as a result of IN-#### designation Audrey Parker/Lexie DeWitt's reappearance, providing hope without a fixed schedule, she developed a working theory that the Troubles were subject IN-####'s Trouble and could therefore be ended if an activated Crocker killed her. Unfortunately, subject did not take into account the data that indicates that the Troubles arrive several years (general pattern suggests approximately two) prior to subject IN-####'s arrival, and thus the theory is implausible at best. Nevertheless, subject continued to put plans in motion, going so far as to subdue and restrain subject TD-BD-#### to remove him from the field of play, and seduce subject BD-#### into willingly activating his Trouble with promises of power and future respect as the man who ended the Troubles for good. Subject TD-BD-#### chose this time to reveal information to her regarding Simon Crocker and the timing of the Troubles, subtly manipulating the subject into the realization that not only has she become the sort of person she despises but that her plan would not, in fact, work. When subject realized this, and upon learning that subject IN-#### designation Audrey Parker/Lexie DeWitt did in fact retain all of Parker's memories and much of her personality, subject appears to have further comprehended the enduring partnership and desire to help others above their own romantic preferences between subjects PT-TR-#### and IN-####. Subsequently, subject attempted to dissuade Wade Crocker from his already-established path of addiction to the rush provided by his Trouble, and in the process of this attempt, he killed her. Subject did not, despite all efforts, provide subject BD-#### with her theory that a Crocker could kill subject IN-#### and thereby end the Troubles.